But you did mention a group--Radfems, and said that they were the only ones condemning Misogyny besides yourself. Unless you have another definition for Radfems other than "people who condemn misogyny" that statement is going to be tautologous. Only Radfems and G.G. condemn Misogyny, and anyone other than G.G. who condemns Misogyny is a RadFem. Maybe it's the NTS fallacy in reverse.

I don't want to be too pedantic about this, even though this kind of hairsplitting is part of my brand on Medium. It seems to me that those people who preach the book of Woke usually put misogyny on their list along with all the other isms. Your experience says otherwise, which puts the burden of proof on me to find some examples to prove my point. I'll prowl around medium for a while and see what I can come up with. You do seem to me to be the only person who attacks Misogyny and separates it from the other isms. That's one of the main things I like about your work. We need more discriminating wisdom, and less blurring of everything together, and you provide an example of that.