Since you can't be bothered to click on the link here are some passages that are significant:

"Now under the rules of discovery much of the evidence Heard gave to the UK judge was then subjected to more rigorous examination and better prepared cross examination. Photographs were demonstrated to have been doctored, medical records were found to be absent, claims that money had been ‘donated’ were found to be somewhat exaggerated.

Things the UK judge had relied upon for his ‘balance of probabilities’ judgment were torn apart under an effective cross.

This more in depth re-match occurred all in front of a watching jury who were tasked with finding a unanimous verdict. . . in the US Heard’s testimony was so wild and unsupported by evidence that the jury found against her on all three claims."