So my argument is false because it is convoluted. Quantum physics is also convoluted. Does that make it false? That's pretty much the only argument you have. The rest of your reply is just abuse, and reiterations of your belief, so it's not possible to respond to it.

To say that you understand the scientific method because you are a scientist is like saying you are a cardiologist because you have a heart. Scientists don't study science. They study the subject matter of their particular specialty. If you had actually studied science itself, the way historians and philosophers of science do, you would know that there is no one scientific method, but a networking matrix of disciplines linked only by a family resemblance that changes over history. Science itself can’t be studied using the scientific method, which is why philosophers and historians of science usually don’t reach consensus . But one thing that they did reach consensus on was that you can’t make philosophical problems disappear just by pretending they are nonsense.

At one point in your first reply, you say, “We are part of a process that is too great and too surprising to be understood by humans, and this is why we cannot access the ultimate truth.” And yet as an Atheist, you are claiming that you have the truth on this topic. This is what happens when you tell yourself you have answers that you don’t have: You end up contradicting yourself. If you think there are more important things to think about than theology, than stop thinking about it. But don’t pretend that you have the answers to these questions just because you don’t want to ask them. When you do that, you are committing the tilde fallacy.