that's exactly what I say in my last paragraph. "My guess is that some of the stories are outright lies, some of them are misleadingly taken out of context, and some describe misguided and badly designed programs that the majority of anti-racist educators would not endorse. " Then I go on to say " But if someone doesn’t clearly explain how Anti-Racist education is actually going to work, and distance it from programs that don’t work, most people will identify Anti-Racist education with programs like these. Praising the idea of anti-racist education will not satisfy people who endorse that idea, but object to ways it is allegedly being taught." There are links in the original article which enable us to check their reliablility.