These things listed in your last paragraph are "omitted" because she doesn't believe them. Again there may be somebody out there who believes them, but there is no evidence that she does.

You have this detailed quasi-Marxist position that you attribute to anyone who says a sentence that triggers you. I've seen you do this many times. My guess is that you grew up in a Marxist society, and this created in you a kind of PTSD that makes you abnormally sensitive to leftist rhetoric. Just because two people might agree about one sentence does not mean they agree about everything else, and it certainly doesn't mean they are going to buy into the Woke Marxism for which you are constantly on the lookout.

There is one very vague abstract sentence at the end of a long video, and you use that sentence to contradict the clearly implied meaning of the entire rest of the video. There is no evidence that she believe in cutting down successful people. She does appear to believe that providing equal opportunities would naturally lead to a result in which we all end up in the "Same place". But this could just as easily mean " a decent middle class income with benefits" As "Everyone makes exactly the same salary, rounded off to the nearest dollar, and everybody wins a participation trophy". The sentence at the start of the video defines equity as equal beginnings, and that is the most plausible interpretation of the last sentence as well.